Skip to main content
Top of the Page
NJSBA
NJICLE
NJSBF
About
News
Contact
Sign in
Join Now
Toggle navigation
NJICLE homepage
Cart
Search
Amarica’s Constitution-03/20/24- Dissenting in Concurrence
The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder. This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many. Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent. Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences? What can we learn from all this?
Your price:
40.00
Must be between 0 and 1000000.
Quantity:
Quantity is required.
Quantity must be a positive whole number.
Back to Top
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##